結果
| 問題 | No.683 Two Operations No.3 |
| コンテスト | |
| ユーザー |
qwewe
|
| 提出日時 | 2025-05-14 13:05:18 |
| 言語 | PyPy3 (7.3.15) |
| 結果 |
AC
|
| 実行時間 | 45 ms / 2,000 ms |
| コード長 | 3,886 bytes |
| 記録 | |
| コンパイル時間 | 173 ms |
| コンパイル使用メモリ | 82,100 KB |
| 実行使用メモリ | 52,224 KB |
| 最終ジャッジ日時 | 2025-05-14 13:07:08 |
| 合計ジャッジ時間 | 1,501 ms |
|
ジャッジサーバーID (参考情報) |
judge5 / judge1 |
(要ログイン)
| ファイルパターン | 結果 |
|---|---|
| other | AC * 16 |
ソースコード
import sys
# Set a higher recursion depth limit for potentially deep recursive calls.
# The problem constraints (A, B up to 10^18) might lead to deep recursion paths
# if one coordinate decreases slowly (by 1).
# The optimization for states on axes (X=0 or Y=0) should mitigate the worst cases,
# but a higher limit is safer. If this causes issues on the judge (e.g., memory),
# an iterative approach or further mathematical insight might be needed.
try:
# Set a reasonably large limit, e.g., 100,000.
# Default is often 1000, which might be too low.
# If the actual path length is bounded polylogarithmically, even ~2500 could be enough.
# Let's use 100,000 as a safer value.
sys.setrecursionlimit(100000)
except Exception:
# If setting recursion limit fails (e.g., due to OS limits or security restrictions),
# we just proceed with the default limit. This might fail for some test cases.
pass
# Use a dictionary for memoization to store results of computed states (X, Y).
# This avoids recomputing results for the same state, turning exponential complexity
# into pseudo-polynomial (related to the number of reachable states).
memo = {}
def can_reach_zero(X, Y):
"""
Recursive function with memoization to check if state (X, Y) can reach (0, 0)
using reverse operations.
"""
# Base case: If either coordinate is 0, we can reach (0, 0).
# This is because states (N, 0) for N > 0 can only transition to (N-1, 0) via RevOp2, eventually reaching (0, 0).
# States (0, M) for M > 0 can only transition to (0, M-1) via RevOp1, eventually reaching (0, 0).
# This also correctly handles the target state (0, 0) itself.
if X == 0 or Y == 0:
return True
# Base case: If coordinates become negative (should not happen from non-negative A, B with reverse ops), it's an invalid path.
if X < 0 or Y < 0:
return False
# Check memoization table. If state result is already computed, return it.
state = (X, Y)
if state in memo:
return memo[state]
# Optimization: If both X and Y are odd positive integers, we are stuck.
# Neither reverse operation can be applied, because RevOp1 requires X even,
# and RevOp2 requires Y even. Since X > 0 and Y > 0, this state cannot reach (0, 0).
if X % 2 != 0 and Y % 2 != 0:
memo[state] = False
return False
# Variable to track if we found any path to (0, 0) from the current state.
found_path = False
# Try applying Reverse Operation 1: (X, Y) -> (X/2, Y-1)
# This is possible if X is even. Since we are past the X=0 check, X > 0.
# Also Y >= 1 is required, which is true since we are past the Y=0 check.
if X % 2 == 0:
# Recursively call for the resulting state. If it can reach (0, 0), set found_path to True.
if can_reach_zero(X // 2, Y - 1):
found_path = True
# Try applying Reverse Operation 2: (X, Y) -> (X-1, Y/2)
# This is possible if Y is even. Since we are past the Y=0 check, Y > 0.
# Also X >= 1 is required, which is true since we are past the X=0 check.
# We only explore this path if the RevOp1 path didn't already find a solution.
# This is a short-circuiting optimization.
if not found_path and Y % 2 == 0:
# Recursively call for the resulting state. If it can reach (0, 0), set found_path to True.
if can_reach_zero(X - 1, Y // 2):
found_path = True
# Store the result for the current state in the memoization table and return it.
memo[state] = found_path
return found_path
# Read non-negative integers A and B from input.
A, B = map(int, sys.stdin.readline().split())
# Call the function starting from the target state (A, B).
# Print "Yes" if (A, B) can reach (0, 0), otherwise print "No".
if can_reach_zero(A, B):
print("Yes")
else:
print("No")
qwewe